Zinc Products 227 litre water butt kit green

Rank #3 in Best Water Butt 2026: £0.24 to £0.71 a Litre

Zinc Products 227 Litre Water Butt Kit, Green with Stand and Diverter

£69.99 4.6 from 148 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The Zinc 227-litre kit is the best-rated water butt in this ranking: 4.6 stars from 148 ratings with only 2 per cent one-star, for £69.99 — £0.308 per litre.

It takes third because the shape costs a little per litre and buys stability: at 99cm wide it is nearly a metre across, which is the dimension to check before ordering. On record it is the safest butt here.

How those 148 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.6 stars.

5 star
79%
4 star
12%
3 star
4%
2 star
3%
1 star
2%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Ratings 4.6 from 148
Capacity 227 litres
Price per litre £0.308
Shape Low and wide
Included Stand, tap, diverter and child-safe lid
Price £69.99

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“Fabulous, easy to install and great for the back of my garden. All good, strong and sturdy.”

Natalie
Verified purchase

“Superb bit of kit, bought two and are now filled with lovely fresh rainwater, ready for the next heatwave.”

Ian F.

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best Water Butt 2026: £0.24 to £0.71 a Litre.

Questions people ask

Why is it the best rated?

4.6 stars from 148 ratings with 2 per cent one-star is the cleanest record in this ranking.

How wide is it?

99cm across, which is the dimension to check against where you plan to put it.

Is a wide butt better?

It is more stable full and easier to conceal, at the cost of floor space.

What is included?

A stand, tap, diverter and child-safe lid.

Why is it third?

Because it costs the same per litre as the warranted Harcostar and takes up more ground.

How many ratings does it have?

148 at the time of collection, averaging 4.6 stars, with 79 per cent five-star and 2 per cent one-star.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.