Best Slow Juicer 2026: Nine Ranked, and Two Listings That Contradict Themselves

This is the best slow juicer here on the two numbers a household actually feels: a 135mm feed chute and a 1.8-litre hopper for £84.98, with 4.6 stars from 1,531 ratings. 76% of those ratings are five-star and only 4% are one or two stars, which is a narrow tail for this category. Crucially, the 1.8 litres is hopper capacity — the fruit you can load — not juice you get back, so it is not comparable with the 700ml that Ninja and AAOBOSI both quote.

In theory a 250W motor looks modest next to the AMZCHEF's 600W, but wattage is not yield. The auger presses slowly, the listing claims a triple-filter stage, and the anti-drip lid and reverse function handle the usual mess. It weighs 4.43kg and measures 37 x 21 x 43cm, so it wants permanent counter space. At the same time, the safety lock means the top cover stays open while you assemble the chute.

That said, it is not dishwasher safe, and Fretta's own spec says so plainly. Every clean is a hand job with the supplied brush — the bullets own up to about five minutes. If you want the best slow juicer you never have to think about afterwards, this is not it, however good the price looks.

Second on the strength of its evidence: 4,999 ratings at 4.3 stars, the largest review sample of the nine. Its 165mm chute is the widest in this group and the 600W DC motor is the highest wattage figure quoted. However, that 600W is doing slow masticating work rather than centrifugal speed, so do not read it as a fast machine. And the 2.5 litres in the spec table is the hopper you fill, not a jug.

Worth noting, this listing does not agree with itself. The spec line promises 'Triple Strainers'; the bullets describe 'Dual Strainers' and 'two strainers'. Either way, you get juice, nut milk and sorbet from one cold press juicer, and the four-piece design is claimed to reduce clogging. Just count the parts in the box before you plan around three.

That said, 9% of its ratings are one-star — the highest one-star share here — against 69% five-star, so the 4.3 average is doing real work. It is 5.4kg and not dishwasher safe. It is also 43cm wide but only 19.5cm deep, which means a shallow counter may suit it better than a deep one.

Third because it is the only machine here that names both of its containers in the spec table: a 700ml juice jug and a separate 1.1-litre pulp container. That is the whole point of this page. 'Capacity: 700 Millilitres' on the Ninja is the jug; 700 millilitres on the AAOBOSI is the cup you drink from. Same number on the page, two different measurements.

At 150W the Ninja shares the lowest wattage figure here with the Philips, and in practice cold press juicing is about torque and auger design rather than watts. A nine-segment auger feeds slowly, the motor is described as quiet, and the listing claims less clogging than its predecessor. It weighs 3.6kg — the lightest machine in this ranking — and the removable parts are dishwasher safe.

The catch is cost per millilitre. At £134 with a 700ml jug it costs more than the Fretta's £84.98 with a 1.8-litre hopper. Even so, if you want the best slow juicer to leave on the counter and rinse without drama, this is the one: 4.5 stars from 533 ratings and everything removable goes in the dishwasher.

Fourth, and holder of the biggest review base here: 5,661 ratings at 4.3 stars. The auger turns at 60 RPM, the listing quotes under 60 decibels, and the parts are BPA-free. Fridja also calls it a whole fruit juicer, and whole apples, carrots and lemons go in without chopping. Meanwhile, this is one of the two listings that disagrees with itself.

Look at the feed chute. The headline says 78mm. The bullet text says a 75mm tilting feeding tube. Three millimetres will not change your morning, but it does tell you the spec table was not checked, and that is the pattern this article is about. In practice this auger juicer does more than juice: sorbet, nut milks, nut butter and fruit ice cream, with two filters and a new sieve so you decide whether pulp stays in.

However, there is no capacity figure anywhere in its spec table — no hopper size, no jug size, nothing in litres or millilitres. If you are comparing volume, this listing gives you nothing to compare. The warranty is one year, the shortest here, and the manufacture year is listed as 2021, so the design predates most of this group.

Fifth on a thinner sample: 4.3 stars from 441 ratings. The listing is unusually specific about numbers — up to 80% extraction, 1 litre of juice in one go, cleanup in 90 seconds with QuickClean. At the same time, this is a masticating juicer rather than a high-speed one, so its 150W is a design choice, not a shortfall, and it matches the Ninja exactly.

In practice the useful details are the boring ones: every part is dishwasher safe, the pulp container stores inside the juice collector, and the spec lists the United Kingdom as the country of origin — rare in this group. A HomeID app supplies recipes, and the controller is listed as 'App', so your phone is part of the intended workflow. The two-year warranty matches the AMZCHEF and the AIRMSEN.

That said, 441 ratings is a quarter of the Fridja's and a tenth of the AMZCHEF's, so the 4.3 is a thinner signal than it looks. There is no feed chute width in millimetres anywhere in the spec table either; the bullets call it an XL feeding tube and stop there. If a specific chute size decides your purchase, this listing will not answer the question.

Sixth, with the highest rating here: 4.9 stars. The sample is 72 ratings, though, which means the number is real but thin — there are no one- or two-star reviews at all and 9% are three-star. The spec gives 250W, and the bullets add a 130mm feed chute, 1.8 litres of capacity and 50 to 60 RPM.

For £88.82 you get the longest warranty in this group: five years, against one for the Fridja and two for the AMZCHEF, Philips and AIRMSEN. It is also dishwasher safe, unlike the AMZCHEF and the Fretta. It is not the quiet slow juicer its rivals claim to be, mind you: the listing says 50 to 60 decibels, where the £79.99 machine claims 35dB and the Fridja claims under 60.

The catch is arithmetic. 72 ratings at 4.9 looks stronger than 5,661 at 4.3 until you notice that a single new one-star review moves the LINKChef further than two hundred would move the Fridja. And the 1.8 litres in the bullets has no matching capacity field in the spec table, so if you are comparing litres across this page, half of this listing's figure lives in prose.

Seventh. On paper it looks strong: a 147mm chute, a 2.1-litre container, a 300W motor at 55 RPM and a filter-free grinding chamber. On 26 ratings, though, it cannot be called the best cold press juicer in this group — that is the smallest sample here, and 4.9 stars from 26 reviews is a thinner claim than 4.9 from 72.

The engineering claim worth checking is the filter-free chamber with 0.1mm teeth. No mesh sieve to scrub is a genuine difference from most of this list. The listing also quotes overheat protection, a one-button reverse function and a 4.7cm angled juice outlet with an anti-drip cap. It is dishwasher safe and the warranty runs two years.

However, the spec table lists the voltage as 120 volts, where every other listing here that states one says 220 or 230. That may be a data-entry slip, but it is the buyer's risk. In short: a good set of features, 26 ratings, and a voltage question to settle before ordering.

Eighth, and the cheapest machine here at £79.99. The chute is 152mm, wider than the Fretta's 135mm, and the auger turns at 45 RPM with a noise claim of 35 decibels — the lowest figure quoted in this group. Meanwhile it is the heaviest, at 6.15kg.

This is a slow masticating juicer with three filter sizes — 2mm, 0.8mm and 0.5mm — so you choose how thick the juice comes out. The listing claims a 2-in-1 mode working as both juicer and soy milk maker, and it carries UKCA and CE certification for electrical safety, which matters for a British kitchen. In practice the safety lock and one-touch reverse cover the usual jam.

That said, the spec table carries no wattage at all. Not a figure. Every other machine here quotes one except this one, so there is no way to compare its motor on paper. Add 6.15kg and just 18 ratings, and the £79.99 looks less like a bargain than the price tag suggests.