Rank #6 in Best Cheap Gaming PC 2026: What £189 Really Buys
XUM Spartan Gaming PC, Ryzen 5 5500GT, Vega 7, 16GB, 1TB
Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.
The XUM Spartan costs £443.49 and is rated 4.0 stars from 20 ratings, with the same Ryzen 5 5500GT and Vega 7 graphics as the machine at number three.
It takes sixth because the hardware is the most modern here and the specification is nearly clean, while it costs eleven pounds more than its twin and publishes no power supply figure.
How those 20 ratings break down
An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.0 stars.
Specification
Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.
| Processor | Ryzen 5 5500GT at 3.9GHz |
|---|---|
| Graphics | Radeon Vega 7, integrated |
| Colour as listed | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Memory | 16GB DDR4, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD |
| Power supply | Not published |
| Price | £443.49 |
What buyers actually say
Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon
Verified purchase“Great machine that does everything we need of it”
Verified purchase“Very nice computer with good RGB ready to play games!!”
What it is up against
The rivals it was ranked against in Best Cheap Gaming PC 2026: What £189 Really Buys.
Rank #1
Veno Scorp Gaming PC i7-3770, 16GB DDR3, GTX 750 4GB, 500W
£320.00
Rank #2
Veno Scorp Gaming PC Bundle, Core i3, 8GB, GTX 750 4GB, 500GB HDD
£265.00
Rank #3
XUM Legend Gaming PC, Ryzen 5 5500GT with Radeon Vega 7, 16GB
£431.99
Rank #4
Veno Scorp Gaming PC, Core i5 3rd Gen, GT 710 2GB, 16GB RAM
£229.00
Questions people ask
Is this different from number three?
In the case and the price, and in which figures are stated.
Which should I buy?
The cheaper of the two; the hardware is identical.
Can it run modern games?
Older and e-sports titles, at reduced settings.
Does it have a graphics card?
No: the graphics are inside the processor.
Why is it sixth?
Because it is the twin of number three at a higher price, with the same missing power supply figure.
How many ratings does it have?
20 at the time of collection, averaging 4 stars, with 62 per cent five-star and 14 per cent one-star.
Comments
Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.
No comments yet
Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.
Leave a comment
No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.