BEEWAY ice scraper with wide TPU blade and shark teeth

Rank #6 in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides

BEEWAY Ice Scraper, Wide 13cm TPU Blade, Shark Teeth, 130g

£9.99 4.5 from 1,260 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The BEEWAY scraper costs £9.99 and is rated 4.5 stars from 1,260 ratings, with a 13 centimetre TPU blade, ABS shark teeth and an aluminium frame.

It takes sixth because it is one of only two listings with the widest blade here and one of the fullest material specifications, while the same scraper is sold again under another brand for less, with a fifth of the ratings.

How those 1,260 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.5 stars.

5 star
70%
4 star
17%
3 star
7%
2 star
3%
1 star
3%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Blade width 13 cm, TPU
Materials TPU, ABS and aluminium alloy
Teeth Shark teeth, cast in ABS
Weight 130 g
Dimensions Package only: 27.9 x 26.9 x 3.9 cm
Ratings 4.5 from 1,260

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“Excellent for reaching the bottom of my chest freezer when defrosting.”

Macdonald
Verified purchase

“A bit expensive for a car ice scrapper but very solid, comfortable and large handle. Would recommend.”

POPEY

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides.

Questions people ask

How wide is the blade?

13 centimetres, made of TPU.

What are shark teeth?

ABS teeth for breaking the crust of ice before the blade passes.

Is it the same as the Cloudgree?

The two listings describe the same design and materials.

How heavy is it?

130 grams.

Why is it sixth?

Because the blade is the widest stated and the materials are named, while the identical scraper is sold cheaper under another brand.

How many ratings does it have?

1260 at the time of collection, averaging 4.5 stars, with 70 per cent five-star and 3 per cent one-star.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.