Cloudgree ice scraper with wide TPU blade

Rank #8 in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides

Cloudgree Ice Scraper, TPU Blade 5.1in / 13cm, Shark Teeth

£9.49 4.4 from 231 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The Cloudgree scraper costs £9.49 and is rated 4.4 stars from 231 ratings, with a 13 centimetre TPU blade, ABS shark teeth and a 140 gram body.

It takes eighth because it is the only listing here to state its blade width in inches and centimetres with the conversion done correctly, while it is the same scraper as the BEEWAY with a fifth of the ratings.

How those 231 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.4 stars.

5 star
73%
4 star
13%
3 star
6%
2 star
3%
1 star
5%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Blade width 5.1in / 13cm, both units
Materials TPU blade and ABS teeth
Weight 140 g
Twinned product The BEEWAY at £9.99
Grip Ergonomic contour, non-slip
Ratings 4.4 from 231

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“Great for icy screens, removed fairly easily.”

Clairet
Verified purchase

“Very handy and useful. Probably the best for the price.”

Andre

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides.

Questions people ask

How wide is the blade?

5.1 inches or 13 centimetres, and the conversion is correct.

Is it the same as the BEEWAY?

The two listings describe the same teeth, blade and materials.

How heavy is it?

140 grams.

Why does it rank below the BEEWAY?

Because it is the same tool with a fifth of the ratings.

Why is it eighth?

Because its width is the most honestly stated here, on the thinnest evidence of the two twins.

How many ratings does it have?

231 at the time of collection, averaging 4.4 stars, with 73 per cent five-star and 5 per cent one-star.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.