HYDRO ice scraper with wide blade and foam grip

Rank #10 in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides

HYDRO Ice Scraper, Wide 11cm Blade, ABS, Foam Grip, 70g

£9.99 3.5 from 130 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The HYDRO scraper costs £9.99 and is rated 3.5 stars from 130 ratings, with an 11 centimetre ABS blade and a 70 gram body.

It takes tenth because its specification is among the fullest here and its rating is the lowest, at exactly the minimum this site accepts — proof that a published blade width is necessary but not sufficient.

How those 130 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 3.5 stars.

5 star
40%
4 star
18%
3 star
13%
2 star
7%
1 star
22%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Blade width 11 cm
Weight 70 g
Body High-strength ABS
Grip Shaped handle with a foam grip
Ratings 3.5 from 130
Price £9.99

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“Does the job and good price, quite durable too”

CALLUM MULLAN
Verified purchase

“Great ice scraper cleared my screen very quickly”

Fred

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best Ice Scraper for Car 2026: The Blade Width Half the Market Hides.

Questions people ask

How wide is the blade?

11 centimetres.

Then why is it last?

Because 130 buyers rate it 3.5 stars, the lowest rating here.

How much does it weigh?

70 grams.

Is 11cm wide?

Second only to the 13 centimetre blades in this ranking, and still last on its reviews.

What does it prove?

That a published width is useful and a satisfied buyer is decisive.

How many ratings does it have?

130 at the time of collection, averaging 3.5 stars, with 40 per cent five-star and 22 per cent one-star.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.