Black Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S mirrorless lens

Rank #4 in Best 70-200mm Lenses 2026: 9 Ranked, and Five Aperture Fields That Don't Add Up

Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

£1,999.00 4.6 from 175 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is a Z-mount telephoto zoom with a constant f/2.8 aperture, optical stabilisation and a 77 mm filter thread. It takes fourth place in this guide at £1,999.00, with 4.6 out of 5 from 175 ratings. Where several lenses in the group have a Focus Type that reads Manual Focus, this listing says Auto Focus, and it matches the group's 77 mm filter size rather than the 52 mm given on the most expensive lens here.

The weak part of this fiche is the spec table arguing with itself. A lens whose Lens Design is 'Zoom' and whose range is 70-200 mm also carries a 'Fixed Focal Length' of 200 Millimetres. The Minimum Aperture is given as '22 Millimetres' — f/22 is a ratio, not a distance — while the Maximum Aperture is written as '2.8 f'. The zoom ratio of 2.86:1 does hold up against 200 divided by 70. Every figure on this page is taken from the Amazon listing — price, ratings, specification fields and buyer comments — and none of it comes from testing by us.

How those 175 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.6 stars.

5 star
81%
4 star
8%
3 star
5%
2 star
2%
1 star
4%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Price £1,999.00
Rating 4.6 out of 5, from 175 ratings
Mount Nikon Z
Focal length 70-200 mm, zoom ratio 2.86:1
Maximum aperture (as listed) 2.8 f
Fixed focal length (as listed) 200 Millimetres, on a zoom lens
Minimum aperture (as listed) 22 Millimetres
Filter thread 77 Millimetres

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“Fast silent autofocus. Razor sharp images. VR is very effective at 200mm. Has been great for walks, getting small birds when close enough. Close up shots on flowers it does very well. No onion rings in the bokeh and smooth background blur. Very nice colours. Will do insects, a fair bit of cropping required but very good for close ups generally. Pretty expensive but it is pro glass and you can tell its pro glass from the results.”

S
Verified purchase

“I have been watching this for a while, so when Amazon offered a 5 month payment period, I clicked on Buy.The very first day I took this crow image and was incredibly impressed with the speed and clarity.I am going to pair it with a 2X converter which will only drop it to F5.6 and be so much lighter than my current 200-500.”

Not a robot

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best 70-200mm Lenses 2026: 9 Ranked, and Five Aperture Fields That Don't Add Up.

Questions people ask

What is the maximum aperture of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S?

The Maximum Aperture field reads '2.8 f', and the product bullet describes 'a constant f2.8 maximum aperture'. The same listing carries a separate Minimum Aperture field of '22 Millimetres'.

What focal length range does the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S cover?

Minimum Focal Length is 70 Millimeters and Maximum Focal Length is 200 Millimeters, with a Zoom Ratio of 2.86:1 — consistent with a 70-200mm zoom. A separate field, Fixed Focal Length, also reads 200 Millimetres, even though the Lens Design is listed as Zoom.

Which cameras does the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S fit?

Nikon Z. Both 'Compatible Mountings' and 'Lens Mount' read Nikon Z, and 'Compatible Camera Models' says Nikon Z series.

Does the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S have image stabilisation?

Yes, as listed: Image Stabilization Type is Optical, and the model name is NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S.

What size filters does the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S take?

Photo Filter Size is given as 77 Millimetres.

How is the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S rated by buyers?

4.6 out of 5 from 175 ratings. The breakdown supplied shows 81 of those at five stars and 11 at three stars or lower.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.