Rank #9 in Best 85 Inch TV 2026: 10 Ranked, and the Refresh Rate That Isn't
Samsung QN70H 85-Inch Neo QLED 4K Mini LED TV
Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.
The Samsung QN70H is one of ten 85-inch televisions in this guide, sitting at number nine. It is a Neo QLED 4K set with a Quantum Mini LED backlight, listed at £1,999.00 and rated 4.3 out of 5 from 13 ratings. The listing names Motion Xcelerator for motion handling, Object Tracking Sound Lite for audio and a 20W, 2ch speaker set-up.
Where this set differs from its Samsung stablemates is the refresh rate. The Samsung QN80F and the Samsung QN73F each give two different figures inside their own listings — 100 Hz in one field, 144 in another. The QN70H gives the same figure twice: 60 under 'Refresh Rate' and 60 under 'Display Refresh Rate in Hertz'. Nothing in this listing claims 144 Hz, so there is no gap between the headline and the panel here, but 60 Hz is also the lowest refresh figure any set in this guide declares. The listing's own numbers disagree in two other places: the rating count reads 13 while the star histogram adds up to 100 votes (10 one-star, 10 three-star, 11 four-star, 69 five-star), and one bullet describes a profile of around 26 mm deep while the dimensions field lists 36.6 cm of depth. Everything on this page comes from the Amazon listing, not from any test of ours.
How those 13 ratings break down
An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.3 stars.
Specification
Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.
| Price | £1,999.00 |
|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 out of 5, from 13 ratings |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Display Refresh Rate in Hertz | 60 |
| Motion Enhancement Technology | Motion Xcelerator |
| Item Dimensions D x W x H | 36.6D x 190.1W x 114.2H centimetres |
| Speaker Description | 20W, 2ch |
| Energy Efficiency Features (as listed) | E |
What buyers actually say
Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon
Verified purchase“Great TV, excellent picture quality, BBC iPlayer app missing from Samsung App Store for this new model, hope that gets added soon. AI mode kept showing "listening" intermittently, which was annoying, but once registered with Alexa, this stopped (not sure if that "AI listening" was related to Samsung's Bixby assistant?). The two Samsung remote controls are good, standard and as expected. Easy to wall mount with standard VESA system. Very pleased overall.”
Verified purchase“Very happy with the purchase. The default sound isn't the best but then again, it never is on most TVs - so would highly recommend a matching sound bar.”
What it is up against
The rivals it was ranked against in Best 85 Inch TV 2026: 10 Ranked, and the Refresh Rate That Isn't.
Questions people ask
What refresh rate does the Samsung QN70H run at?
Both refresh-rate fields in the listing read 60 Hz — the 'Refresh Rate' field and the 'Display Refresh Rate in Hertz' field. That is below the 100/144 Hz pairs the Samsung QN80F and QN73F listings carry in the same guide.
Does the Samsung QN70H have a 144 Hz panel?
No figure of 144 Hz appears in this listing. The two refresh fields both read 60 Hz, and the only motion feature named is Motion Xcelerator.
How much does the Samsung QN70H cost?
The listing price is £1,999.00.
What do the ratings on the Samsung QN70H show?
The listing shows 4.3 out of 5, but the rating count reads 13 while the star histogram lists 10 one-star, 10 three-star, 11 four-star and 69 five-star votes — 100 votes in total, as listed.
How thick is the Samsung QN70H?
One bullet describes an ultra-slim profile of around 26 mm deep, while the dimensions field states 36.6D x 190.1W x 114.2H centimetres. Both figures come from the same listing.
What sound does the Samsung QN70H offer?
The listing describes 20W, 2ch speakers with Object Tracking Sound Lite, and the title names Adaptive Sound+, spelt 'Adpative Sound+' as listed.
Comments
Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.
No comments yet
Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.
Leave a comment
No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.