Amazon Basics 15W Qi wireless charging pad black with USB-C cable

Rank #5 in Best Wireless Charger 2026: What 15W Actually Means

Amazon Basics 15W Qi Wireless Charging Pad, USB-C, No Adapter

£10.99 4.1 from 6,621 Amazon ratings
Check price on Amazon

Price and rating as shown on Amazon when we collected them. Both change.

The Amazon Basics 15W pad costs £10.99 and is rated 4.1 stars from 6,621 ratings, with a USB-C connector and a Qi certificate.

It takes fifth because it is the only listing here that states the three wattages it actually delivers and the adaptor needed for the highest, while its one-star share is the highest of the four big-brand pads.

How those 6,621 ratings break down

An average hides its own shape. This is the spread behind the 4.1 stars.

5 star
61%
4 star
16%
3 star
10%
2 star
4%
1 star
9%

Specification

Exactly as published on the Amazon listing, field for field.

Wattage as listed 15 watts
Charging by phone 15W LG, 10W Samsung, 7.5W iPhone
Adaptor needed 9V/2A for 10W, 30W PD for 15W
Power plug type No Plug
Connector USB Type A to USB-C
Ratings 4.1 from 6,621

What buyers actually say

Quoted from customer reviews on Amazon

Verified purchase

“A very good item, works very well, I was surprised. B!”

Amazon Customer
Verified purchase

“Bought this for a Galaxy S23 Ultra.Charging well and happy with the wireless charger.Would buy again if needed.13/7/26”

James lowell

What it is up against

The rivals it was ranked against in Best Wireless Charger 2026: What 15W Actually Means.

Questions people ask

Do I get 15W?

Only with a 30W PD 3.0 adaptor and a phone that accepts it.

How fast will it charge my iPhone?

7.5W, which is Apple's limit on this kind of pad.

Is the adaptor included?

No, and the listing says so.

Why does the speed differ by phone?

Because the phone decides what it will accept from the coil.

Why is it fifth?

Because the documentation is the best here, but the one-star share is the highest of the mainstream pads.

How many ratings does it have?

6621 at the time of collection, averaging 4.1 stars, with 61 per cent five-star and 9 per cent one-star.

Comments

Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.

No comments yet

Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.

Leave a comment

No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.

2000 left

Comments with links are checked before they appear. See our privacy policy.