Best RX 9060 XT Graphics Card 2026: 10 Ranked, Specs That Disagree
By Felipe Iglesias · Updated
Every card on this page runs the same 128-bit GPU, yet the listings cannot agree what that GPU is. The Gigabyte ICE 16G title claims a 256bit memory bus while the bullet list in the very same listing says '16GB GDDR6 128bit memory interface' — one of those numbers has been invented. If you want the best RX 9060 XT graphics card, start there. Meanwhile the ASUS PRIME spec table names 'AMD Radeon RX 9070' as the graphics coprocessor, quotes 3310 MHz where its own title says 3330 MHz, and is the dearest card here at £519.98. Crucially, the same GDDR6 is quoted as 2,500 MHz on both Sapphire cards and 20,000 MHz on both Gigabyte cards — an eightfold gap that is a unit convention, not a speed.
We ranked ten of the best RX 9060 XT graphics cards on Amazon on what each listing can actually evidence: the price against the documented spec, whether the memory bus and clock figures agree with themselves, the physical size and power requirement, and the balance of 5-star against 1-star ratings rather than the headline average alone.
Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming OC 16G
The best RX 9060 XT graphics card here by review volume: 747 ratings at 4.7 stars and a title figure of 3320 MHz core clock.
Advantages
- 747 Amazon ratings at 4.7 stars, the largest sample on this page
- 16GB GDDR6 on the correct 128-bit bus, stated correctly in its own bullets
- Three-fan WINDFORCE cooler with Dual BIOS (Performance / Silent)
- Title figure of 3320 MHz core clock; PCIe 5.0 interface
- Two DisplayPort plus one HDMI, quoted maximum resolution 7680 x 4320
Disadvantages
- £499.99 — £60 more than the cheapest 16GB card here
- Memory clock listed as 20000 MHz while Sapphire lists 2500 MHz for the same GDDR6
- 'Antenna Location: Gaming' and 'Box Contents: Manual' are filler fields, not information
- 128-bit bus limits bandwidth regardless of the 16GB capacity
It takes first place on evidence rather than adjectives: 747 ratings at 4.7 stars, the largest review base on this page, a title figure of 3320 MHz core clock, and a bullet list that states the bus correctly as '16GB GDDR6 128bit memory interface'. The RX 9060 XT is a 128-bit part, and this listing says so. If you want the best RX 9060 XT graphics card on consistency rather than marketing copy, this is the listing that holds together.
In practice the GAMING OC is a three-fan card with the WINDFORCE cooler, RGB lighting, a reinforced structure and a Dual BIOS switch for Performance or Silent profiles. Outputs are two DisplayPort and one HDMI, with a quoted maximum resolution of 7680 x 4320. The memory clock is listed as 20000 MHz, which is the same 20 Gbps figure other brands render as 2,500 MHz or 20 GHz — a naming convention, not a faster chip.
That said, it is not the cheapest route to the same GPU. The ASUS Dual sits at £439.99 and the PowerColor Reaper at £457.98, so you are paying a premium here for the cooler, the extra fan and the stronger review record. If your case is tight, or you simply want the lowest price for 16GB of RX 9060 XT, this is not the card to buy.
ASRock RX 9060 XT Challenger 16GB OC
4.8 stars from 240 ratings — the highest average here — in a 249 mm two-slot body needing one 8-pin connector.
Advantages
- 4.8 stars from 240 ratings, the highest average on this page
- Listed boost clock 3290 MHz with a 2700 MHz game clock
- 16GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 20 Gbps, PCIe 5.0 x16
- 249 mm long, two slots, single 8-pin connector, 550W PSU recommended
- 32 compute units with 3rd-gen ray tracing and 2nd-gen AI accelerators
Disadvantages
- Spec table lists the same 3290 MHz for both GPU and memory clock
- 'GPU Series' field says AMD RX 6000 Series, which is wrong for this card
- Maximum resolution given as both 3840x2160 and 7680x4320
- Box contents list only a quick installation guide
This is the highest-rated card on the page at 4.8 stars from 240 ratings, and the listing is unusually specific: the card measures 249 mm long, 132 mm wide and 41 mm high, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and the seller asks for a 550W power supply. Boost clock is quoted at 3290 MHz with a game clock of 2700 MHz. As an RX 9060 XT 16GB graphics card it is also one of the few listings here that spells out the 128-bit bus and the 20 Gbps memory speed in the same breath.
The RDNA 4 detail is spelled out as 32 compute units with third-generation ray tracing and second-generation AI accelerators, aimed at 1440p gaming — a fair claim at this tier, and a reminder that this GPU belongs on a best graphics card for 1440p shortlist rather than a 4K one. The two-slot, 249 mm footprint fits most mid-tower cases. In theory the single 8-pin connector also makes it a simpler upgrade than cards needing more.
However, the spec table contradicts itself in small ways. GPU clock speed and memory clock speed are both listed as 3290 MHz, which cannot be right for GDDR6. The GPU series field says 'AMD RX 6000 Series', and the display resolution appears twice — once as 3840x2160 and once as 7680x4320. None of that changes the hardware, but it means you should trust the bullets and the physical dimensions over the table. If you would rather buy from the brand with the largest review base here, look at the Gigabyte instead.
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
The cheapest RX 9060 XT graphics card here at £439.99, with a quoted 3250 MHz clock and a 2.5-slot axial-tech cooler.
Advantages
- £439.99, the lowest price for a 16GB RX 9060 XT here
- Quoted 3250 MHz boost clock
- 2.5-slot axial-tech design with 0dB fan-stop technology
- Dual BIOS with Quiet and Performance profiles
- Dual ball fan bearings rated at up to twice sleeve-bearing life
Disadvantages
- GPU series field says AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series
- Memory clock listed as 2620 MHz, the same figure another card uses for its GPU clock
- Compatible devices field includes 'Laptop'
- 161 ratings against 747 for the top card here
At £439.99 this is the cheapest RX 9060 XT graphics card on the page, and it still carries 16GB of GDDR6 with a quoted 3250 MHz GPU clock. It sits below the PowerColor Reaper at £457.98 and well below the £519.98 ASUS PRIME, so if price is the deciding factor the search largely ends here.
The cooler is the interesting part. Axial-tech fans use a smaller hub with longer blades and a barrier ring to push air down onto the heatsink, the 2.5-slot body is designed to fit smaller chassis, and 0dB technology stops the fans entirely at light loads. Dual BIOS gives you Quiet and Performance profiles, and the dual ball bearings are rated at up to twice the life of sleeve bearings. Which means it is a practical card for a quiet mid-range build rather than a showpiece.
Even so, the listing has its own errors. The GPU series field says 'AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series', the memory clock is quoted at 2620 MHz — a figure another card here uses for its GPU clock — and the compatibility field lists 'Laptop, Desktop Computer' for a card that is a desktop part. If you want the highest-rated option or the biggest review base, this is not it; 161 ratings at 4.6 stars is solid, but the Gigabyte's 747 is a different scale.
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming OC 16GB
341 ratings at 4.6 stars and a listed 3320 MHz clock in a 240 mm body — but the whole bullet list is 'RX9060XT 16GB'.
Advantages
- 341 ratings at 4.6 stars, the second-largest review base here
- Listed 3320 MHz GPU clock, matching the fastest figures on this page
- 16GB GDDR6, PCIe x16 interface, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs
- 240 mm long, one of the shorter 16GB cards listed
- Nitro+ branding with a 4.6-star average across 341 buyers
Disadvantages
- Bullet list contains one line: 'RX9060XT 16GB'
- Graphics coprocessor field reads 'Rrx9060xt'
- No fan count, power connector or PSU recommendation in the listing
- Memory clock listed as 2500 MHz against 20000 MHz on the Gigabyte cards
The Nitro+ is the stronger of the two Sapphire cards on volume: 341 ratings at 4.6 stars, against 177 for the Pure further down. The spec table quotes a 3320 MHz GPU clock and a 240 x 124 mm footprint. The graphics coprocessor field reads 'Rrx9060xt' — a typo, not a different chip — and the product title confirms it as an AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT.
This is a premium Nitro+ cooler in a 9060 XT package, and the listing's only descriptive bullet is 'RX9060XT 16GB'. That is a genuine problem for a buyer: there is no quoted fan count, no power connector, no recommended PSU and no card length in the bullets, so you are working from the spec table alone. In practice you should check the manufacturer's own page for clearance figures before ordering, because 240 mm is the only length given here.
Worth noting the memory clock field says 2500 MHz. The Gigabyte cards say 20000 MHz for what is the same GDDR6 — an eightfold difference that is a unit convention, not a speed. That said, if you want detailed specs before you buy, this listing gives you less than almost any other on the page. Buyers who need to know the exact connector and clearance should look at the ASRock or PowerColor entries instead.
PowerColor Radeon RX 9060 XT Reaper 16GB
200 mm long and £457.98 — the shortest 16GB card here, and it asks for only a 500W power supply.
Advantages
- £457.98, second-cheapest 16GB card on this page
- 200 mm long, the shortest 16GB card listed
- Single 8-pin connector, 500W PSU recommended
- Two fans, one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs
- 263 ratings at 4.6 stars
Disadvantages
- Graphics description quotes a '320 MHz Boost Clock'
- GPU clock field says 2620 MHz; the boost figure is not stated consistently
- Memory clock given as '20 GHz' in one field and 20,000 MHz in another
- Maximum display resolution is listed only as '4K'
The Reaper is the compact option: 200 mm long, 100 mm wide and 39 mm thick in the bullets, 200*100*39mm in the dimensions field, with two fans and a single 8-pin connector. PowerColor asks for a 500W supply, the lowest requirement stated on this page. At £457.98 it undercuts the Sapphire Pure by £2 and the Gigabyte GAMING OC by £42.
For a small case or an older build this is the card that fits: 200 mm is short enough for most mini-ITX and mATX enclosures, and the single 8-pin plus 500W guidance keeps a PSU upgrade optional. Outputs are one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a. Meanwhile the quoted memory clock of 20 GHz is the same 20 Gbps figure the Gigabyte cards list as 20000 MHz. For a buyer hunting the best RX 9060 XT graphics card that will actually fit, 200 mm is the number that matters.
The catch is the clock data. The GPU clock field says 2620 MHz, while the graphics description says '320 MHz Boost Clock' — a figure that appears nowhere else and looks like a dropped digit. Either way, do not read this listing's clock figures as comparable to the 3290 MHz and 3320 MHz claims elsewhere without checking which figure is which. If you want the fastest documented boost clock here, this is not it.
Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
£459.98 for a listed 3290 MHz clock and 16GB of GDDR6, with a 4.5-star average from 177 ratings.
Advantages
- £459.98 for 16GB of GDDR6
- Listed 3290 MHz GPU clock
- 16GB buffer suits 1440p texture loads better than an 8GB card
- HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, PCIe x16
- 177 ratings at 4.5 stars
Disadvantages
- 4.5 stars is the lowest average here except the Gigabyte ICE
- Bullet list contains only 'RX9060XT 16GB'
- No fan count, power connector or PSU recommendation
- Memory clock listed as 2500 MHz
Sapphire's second card here lists a 3290 MHz GPU clock for £459.98, which is £40 less than the Nitro+ for a different cooler. Its rating is 4.5 stars from 177 ratings — the weakest average on this page apart from the Gigabyte ICE at 4.3. On the RX 9060 XT 8GB vs 16GB question, this is a 16GB card, and at 1440p with modern texture packs the larger buffer is the reason to pick it over an 8GB part.
The spec table is short. There is no fan count, no card length beyond the box contents line, and no power connector guidance. What you get is 16GB of GDDR6 on a PCIe x16 interface, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, and a 3840 x 2160 quoted maximum resolution. It is the least documented entry from Sapphire, and the one-line bullet 'RX9060XT 16GB' gives you nothing else to work from.
As a result, this is a card to buy on price and brand rather than on published detail. The memory clock is listed as 2500 MHz, the same convention the Nitro+ uses and one eighth of what the Gigabyte cards call 20000 MHz. If you want the clock, the connectors and the dimensions all stated before you order, spend the extra on a better-documented listing.
XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC White 16GB
A white three-fan card at £481.00 with base, game and boost clocks all published — 1900, 2780 and 3320 MHz.
Advantages
- Publishes base (1900 MHz), game (2780 MHz) and boost (3320 MHz) clocks
- 3320 MHz boost matches the highest figure on this page
- Three-fan white cooler, 270 x 124 mm, 1.35 kg
- 16GB GDDR6, PCIe x16, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs
- 4.7 stars from 86 ratings
Disadvantages
- Spec table's GPU clock field lists only the 1900 MHz base clock
- 86 ratings is a small sample compared with the top cards
- 270 mm length will not fit every small case
- Warranty card is the only item listed in the box
XFX publishes three clock figures where most listings publish one: base up to 1900 MHz, game up to 2780 MHz and boost up to 3320 MHz. That 3320 MHz boost matches the fastest number on this page. The card weighs 1.35 kg, measures 270 x 124 mm and has three fans. At £481.00 it sits between the PowerColor Reaper and the Gigabyte GAMING OC.
The white finish is the point for some builds, and the specs back it up: 16GB of GDDR6, a PCIe x16 interface, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, and a quoted 3840 x 2160 maximum resolution. Memory clock is listed as 20 GHz. In practice, three fans and a 270 mm card mean you should measure your case first — this is not a small-form-factor part. If the best RX 9060 XT graphics card for your white build is the question, this is one of two answers on this page.
However, the spec table's GPU clock speed field says 1900 MHz. That is the base clock, not the boost, and anyone skimming the table could reasonably conclude this is a 1900 MHz card. That said, the bullets and the graphics description both give the full three-figure picture, so the data is there if you read past the first field. If you want a white card, this is the only one with three fans; if you want the maximum number of buyer reviews, it has the second-smallest sample here.
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB White Edition
The same Dual cooler in white for £479.99, with a 3250 MHz clock and a memory clock field of 3230 MHz that nearly matches it.
Advantages
- White Edition finish, same 3250 MHz quoted clock as the black Dual
- 2.5-slot axial-tech cooler with 0dB technology and Dual BIOS
- HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, PCIe 5.0
- 601 g, one of the lighter 16GB cards here
- 72 ratings at 4.6 stars
Disadvantages
- £479.99 — £40 more than the identical black ASUS Dual
- Memory clock field says 3230 MHz, close to the 3250 MHz GPU clock
- Two different maximum resolution figures in the same spec table
- 72 ratings is the smallest sample on this page
This is the white version of the Dual listed further up, at £479.99 rather than £439.99 — a £40 premium for the colour and nothing else in the published data. The clock is the same 3250 MHz, the memory is the same 16GB of GDDR6, and the cooler is the same 2.5-slot axial-tech design with 0dB fan stop and Dual BIOS.
As a best RX 9060 XT 16GB card for a white build, it does the job: HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, PCIe 5.0, and 72 ratings at 4.6 stars. The card weighs 601 g, one of the lighter figures here. Meanwhile the memory clock is quoted at 3230 MHz, which is close enough to the 3250 MHz GPU clock to suggest the two figures were not pulled independently.
The catch is the resolution data. The display maximum resolution field says 8192x4320, while the maximum display resolution field says 7680 pixels — two different answers to the same question. That said, this is a £479.99 card whose non-white twin sells for £439.99 with an identical cooler and clock. Unless the colour matters to you, you are paying £40 for paint.
ASUS PRIME Radeon RX 9060 XT OC 16GB
The dearest card here at £519.98, and the only one whose own spec table names a different GPU — 'AMD Radeon RX 9070'.
Advantages
- Compact, SFF-ready three-fan design with PCIe 5.0
- Listed 3352 AI TOPS
- 16GB GDDR6 with HDMI and two DisplayPort outputs
- 159 ratings at 4.6 stars
- Overclocked as standard per the product title
Disadvantages
- £519.98, the highest price here
- Graphics coprocessor field names 'AMD Radeon RX 9070'
- Title says 3330 MHz, spec table says 3310 MHz
- GPU series field says AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series; memory clock repeats the GPU clock figure
At £519.98 this is the most expensive card on the page, £80 more than the cheapest 16GB option. It is also the listing with the clearest internal contradiction: the title says 3330 MHz clock, the spec table says 3310 MHz, and the graphics coprocessor field says 'AMD Radeon RX 9070'. The card is sold as an RX 9060 XT and the graphics description says so, so the 9070 entry is almost certainly a copy-and-paste error. Still, if you are hunting the best RX 9060 XT graphics card and you reach a £519.98 listing whose spec table names another chip, that is worth pausing over.
What the card does offer is an overclocked, compact SFF-ready three-fan design, PCIe 5.0, 16GB of GDDR6 and HDMI plus two DisplayPort outputs. The listed AI performance is 3352 AI TOPS. The GPU series field, meanwhile, says 'AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series', and the memory clock is given as 3310 MHz — the same number as the GPU clock, which again suggests fields were populated from one source.
Which means there is no clear reason to pay £40 more than the Gigabyte GAMING OC or £80 more than the ASUS Dual for the same 16GB of GDDR6. If you specifically need a compact SFF-ready card with three fans, the form factor is the argument. If you do not, the price is the problem.
Gigabyte RX 9060 XT Gaming OC ICE 16G
The listing that contradicts itself: the title claims a 256bit bus, its own bullets say 128bit — and it has the most 1-star ratings here.
Advantages
- 3320 MHz core clock, matching the fastest figures here
- Three-fan WINDFORCE cooler with RGB lighting and a reinforced structure
- 16GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, per its own bullet list
- Two DisplayPort and one HDMI, quoted 7680 x 4320 maximum resolution
- PCIe 5.0 support, 840 g
Disadvantages
- Title claims a 256bit memory bus; its own bullets say 128bit
- £510.99, £11 more than the standard Gigabyte GAMING OC 16G
- 4.3 stars from 78 ratings, including 10 one-star reviews
- Memory clock listed as 20000 MHz against 2500 MHz on both Sapphire cards
Start with the bus. The title of this listing claims '256bit'. The bullet list in the same listing says '16GB GDDR6 128bit memory interface'. The RX 9060 XT is a 128-bit card, so one of those numbers has been invented, and the £510.99 price does not buy a wider bus.
Physically it is the same formula as the non-ICE Gaming OC: three fans, the WINDFORCE cooling system, RGB lighting, a reinforced structure and a 3320 MHz core clock, with two DisplayPort and one HDMI output and a quoted 7680 x 4320 maximum resolution. The card weighs 840 g. The memory clock is listed as 20000 MHz, matching the other Gigabyte card and eight times the 2500 MHz figure on both Sapphire listings.
The RX 9060 XT graphics card price here is the second highest on this page, and the rating is the lowest: 4.3 stars from 78 ratings, including 10 one-star reviews out of the 100 ratings shown. By contrast, the GAMING OC 16G that sits £11 cheaper carries 4.7 from 747 ratings. That said, the ICE is only £11 more than the standard GAMING OC — but on this listing's own numbers, the cheaper card is the better documented one.
All 10 compared
The same ranking side by side, now that the numbers have names.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
| # | Product | Price | Amazon rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming OC 16G | £499.99 | 4.7 (747) |
| 2 | ASRock RX 9060 XT Challenger 16GB OC | £479.68 | 4.8 (240) |
| 3 | ASUS Dual Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB | £439.99 | 4.6 (161) |
| 4 | Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming OC 16GB | £499.98 | 4.6 (341) |
| 5 | PowerColor Radeon RX 9060 XT Reaper 16GB | £457.98 | 4.6 (263) |
| 6 | Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB | £459.98 | 4.5 (177) |
| 7 | XFX Swift Radeon RX 9060 XT OC White 16GB | £481.00 | 4.7 (86) |
| 8 | ASUS Dual Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB White Edition | £479.99 | 4.6 (72) |
| 9 | ASUS PRIME Radeon RX 9060 XT OC 16GB | £519.98 | 4.6 (159) |
| 10 | Gigabyte RX 9060 XT Gaming OC ICE 16G | £510.99 | 4.3 (78) |
Final Verdict
For most builds the ASUS Dual at £439.99 is the cheapest route to 16GB of GDDR6 and a quoted 3250 MHz clock, while the Gigabyte GAMING OC 16G at £499.99 adds a third fan, Dual BIOS and the largest review base here — 747 ratings at 4.7 stars — which is why it takes the top spot as the best RX 9060 XT graphics card on evidence. If you need a compact card instead, the PowerColor Reaper's 200 mm body and 500W requirement make it the easiest fit. Meanwhile the £519.98 ASUS PRIME is the weakest value on its own spec sheet: an RX 9070 in the coprocessor field, 3310 MHz against a 3330 MHz title, and no wider memory bus to show for the extra money. Whichever you choose, treat the clock and memory figures as conventions rather than measurements, and remember that the best RX 9060 XT graphics card for your case is the one that fits it.
Why trust this ranking?
We rank on price, customer ratings and the specifications that decide the job, and we read each specification table against the marketing bullets on the same listing. When a number does not survive that check, we say so in the entry rather than quietly dropping the product. We also say when a product is the wrong one for you.
How we rank, in full
Written by
Felipe Iglesias
Founder & Lead Reviewer
Felipe is a computational engineering student who has been working in SEO since he was sixteen. He founded ranked10 and researches every guide on the site.
Related buying guides
Every guide below ranks ten products the same way this one does.
Tech
Best Mini Projector 2026: 10 Ranked
The best mini projector here is the XuanPad 40000L at £129.99: native 1080p and Netflix built in. We rank 10 and compare the real ANSI lumens.
Tech
Best Gaming Motherboard 2026: 10 Ranked
Best gaming motherboard 2026: the £127.99 ASUS TUF Gaming B650-Plus WiFi wins with 14 power stages at £9.14 each, half the £16.22 a stage of a dearer board.
Tech
Best Floorstanding Speakers 2026: 10 Ranked
Best floorstanding speakers 2026: the Q Acoustics 3050i wins with two 165 mm drivers per tower, and the Fenton SHF700B pair costs £159.90.
Tech
Best Binoculars 2026: 10 Ranked
The best binoculars for 2026 ranked: the £25.99 Kylietech 12x42 gives a 3.5 mm exit pupil, nearly three times the light of the £34.99 occer 12x25.
Tech
Best Camcorder 2026: 10 Ranked
The best camcorder for most buyers is the FIREFOTO 4K 64MP at £59.99, working out at £0.94 a megapixel against £2.49 on the 8K PITIKI.
Tech
Best OLED Gaming Monitor 2026: 10 Ranked, Brightness Listed Four Ways
The best OLED gaming monitor picks ranked by panel, refresh rate and price — brightness is listed four different ways across these listings.
Tech
Best 128GB SD Cards 2026: 10 Ranked, and Three Adverts That Contradict Themselves
Every 128GB SD card here leads with read speed. Three listings contradict their own specs — we show you both numbers before you buy.
Tech
Best DAB Radios 2026: 9 Ranked, and the 30W Claim That Doesn't Add Up
The best DAB radios compared: one claims 30W yet a 2,000mAh battery lasting 10 hours — that averages 0.74W. Nine models ranked on their own figures.
Tech
Best CPU Air Cooler 2026: 10 Ranked, One Sold Twice at Two Prices
We ranked the best CPU air cooler picks on Amazon, including the same Peerless Assassin 120 SE listed twice at £29.99 and £35.90.
Tech
Best Case Fans 2026: 9 Ranked by What a Fan Actually Costs
The best case fans are rarely sold singly: a £21.49 five-pack is £4.30 a fan, while £18.99 buys one. Nine ranked by cost per fan and quoted noise.
Products you might like
The best rated products from our other Tech guides.
Comments
Reader comments are not checked against the manufacturer's claims above.
No comments yet
Be the first to add something we missed — a price change, a spec that turned out wrong, or how one of these held up.
Leave a comment
No account needed. Own one of these? Tell other readers how it actually performed.