Best OLED TV 2026: 10 Ranked, and Why the Price Ladder Is Upside-Down

This sits first because it carries more feedback than anything else on the page: 634 ratings at 4.4, with 78 of them five-star. It is also the only set here built for wall mounting, with the flush-fit bracket in the box. The weight fields deserve a second look, however — 28.5 kg as shipped and 22 kg without the stand, a 6.5 kg difference, on a model sold as the wall-mount version with no pedestal in the box.

As the flagship it takes the α11 Gen3 processor, Brightness Booster Ultra and a Reflection Free Premium coating. That combination is what puts it at the front of the best OLED TV for a bright room conversation, where cutting reflections matters more than a peak brightness figure. Worth noting: three spec fields say 120 Hz, while the 165 Hz figure appears only in the product name, listed as VRR.

That said, most buyers should not start here. £2,799 is £1,320 more than the 65-inch LG C5, and if you want a stand you will have to buy one separately. Nine of its 634 ratings are one-star — the joint-highest absolute count in this guide.

Second place goes to the model that undercuts the G6 by £1,320 while giving up less than that gap suggests. It carries 185 ratings at 4.6 — a higher score than the flagship — and the panel is 16.6 kg without its stand, which is 5.4 kg lighter than the G6's 22 kg.

The α9 Gen7 processor handles upscaling, and the audio side is unusually specific: the listing names 7.1.2 channels with Dolby Atmos. Dolby Vision and Filmmaker Mode are both present, which is why this is the set we would point at first when someone asks which is the best OLED TV at 65 inches without flagship money attached. Energy class F is the trade-off.

However, £1,479 is still £280 above the 65-inch Samsung S90F at £1,199. The C5 listing also does not state an HDMI port count anywhere, so you are comparing a documented four inputs on the Samsung against an undocumented number here.

At £1,199 this is the least expensive 65-inch set in the guide, and at 21.2 kg it is the lightest 65-inch listed. It sits third rather than first because of what the page says about motion: the bullets promise Motion Xcelerator 144Hz, while the spec table gives 120 under "Refresh Rate" and 120 again under "Display Refresh Rate in Hertz". If you are hunting the best 65 inch OLED TV bargain, that gap is worth resolving before you order.

In practice the rest of the sheet is consistent. OLED HDR+, 4K AI Upscaling Pro, Dolby Atmos with Object Tracking Sound Lite and four HDMI ports. The chassis is 144.4 cm wide, 83.2 cm tall and 4 cm deep.

The catch is the rating spread: 109 reviews at 4.2, and 14 of them are one-star — the highest absolute count at this size. Anyone weighing LG OLED vs Samsung OLED should note this set costs £280 less than the LG C5 with a broadly similar core specification.

This is the entry that makes the price ladder hard to trust. Its dimensions are 144.4 x 83.2 x 4 cm and its weight is 21.2 kg — identical, to the digit, to the £1,199 S90F. The five bullet points are identical too. The price is £1,499.99, which is £300.99 more.

Its own spec table does not agree with itself either. One field gives "Refresh Rate: 100 Hz". Another gives "Display Refresh Rate in Hertz: 144". The bullets say Motion Xcelerator 144Hz. As a result, the figure you plan around is the one you decide to trust. It does state a 3000000:1 contrast ratio and four HDMI ports, which the S90F sheet leaves out.

With 22 ratings at 4.6, the sample behind the score is roughly a fifth the size of the S90F's 109. The internet applications field reads "Popular streaming services likely supported", which is a placeholder rather than a list. Either way, at £1,499.99 you are paying £300.99 over a set the listing itself describes as the same size and weight.

The 42-inch QE42S90F is the cheapest set here at £759 and by far the lightest at 8.7 kg, on a 4 cm-deep chassis. It is also the only one that names FreeSync Premium Pro, alongside Motion Xcelerator 144Hz — the clearest claim to being the best OLED TV for gaming on this page.

Brightness is given as 1500 nits with a matt anti-reflective coating, so daytime viewing is plausible without blacking out the room. It carries four HDMI 2.1 inputs, Object Tracking Sound and Dolby Atmos.

Two lines on the listing do not hold up, however. The backlight configuration is given as "Full Array Local Dimming", which an OLED panel does not have — OLED pixels light themselves. The internet applications field names "Google TV", while the bullets correctly describe Samsung's Tizen system. In short, check the model against Samsung's own page before ordering.

The C6 has the best star score on the page: 4.9, though it rests on 14 ratings, the smallest sample here. Its histogram contains no four-star entries at all — 94% five-star and 6% three-star. The panel is 9.8 kg without its stand and 93.2 cm wide.

It carries the same α11 Gen3 processor as the £2,799 G6, with AI Picture Pro, Dynamic Tone Mapping Ultra and four HDMI ports. Dolby Vision and Filmmaker Mode are both listed. In a small room where you sit close, that processing matters more than screen size.

The catch is arithmetic. At £1,099, this 42-inch set costs £300 more than LG's own 48-inch C4 at £799, and £371.93 more than the 48-inch B5 at £727.07. You are paying for the newer processor and a smaller panel. Buy it only if the 42-inch footprint is the whole point.

This is the clearest example of the inverted ladder. £1,369 buys 55 inches here. £1,199 buys 65 inches in the S90F. That is £170 more for ten fewer inches, and the S95F weighs 13.8 kg against the S90F's 21.2 kg.

What the money goes on is visible in the spec: a 1.1 cm-deep panel with the Infinity One Design and a One Connect Box, 165 Hz motion, glare-free OLED HDR Pro and Object Tracking Sound+ across eight speakers. At the same time, that 1.1 cm figure is the panel alone, not the set on a stand.

Crucially, check the ratings before committing. Its 4.0 average comes from 28 reviews, and 17 of them are one-star with a further 10 at two stars. If you are weighing LG OLED vs Samsung OLED at this size, the 65-inch LG C5 is £110 more and has a far stronger record behind it.

At £799 this is the second-cheapest set here, and the one that makes the 42-inch C6 look expensive. It measures 107.1 cm wide and 67.5 cm tall, weighs 20 kg on its stand and 14.9 kg without it.

The α9 Gen7 processor handles upscaling, and the listing names 40 W of speaker output with Dolby Atmos in surround mode. A 178-degree viewing angle is stated, which matters if the sofa sits off-centre. On the numbers given, this is the best 48 inch OLED TV value on the page.

Two things to accept. It is the 2024 model, so the α9 Gen7 here is a generation behind the α11 in the C6. And the finish is Umber Brown rather than black — a detail that surprises people ordering from a thumbnail.

295 ratings at 4.1 — the largest review sample in the guide after the G6. It is a 55-inch panel at £899, sitting below both 65-inch LGs and above the 48-inch options.

Ambilight is the differentiator: LEDs behind the panel that react to the picture. The P5 AI Perfect Picture Engine, Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos complete the package, along with Titan OS and a stated 1000-nit brightness. For the best OLED TV for movies in a room you can dim, the bias lighting does real work.

However, its weight fields cannot both be right. The listing gives 10 kg with the stand and 17.28 kg without it — a set does not get heavier when the stand comes off. The contrast ratio field reads "Wysoki", and the backlight configuration says "Direct LED". Three data points on one page that describe no OLED.